Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: Stements & relations (was [cti-stix] [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable)

From
Jerome Athias <>
Date
2015-11-12T02:06:40+00:00
ID
CAA=AuEc+i+kHvXZAmXg1vH=bqWP2gZCw+a9t=
Thread
Re: Stements & relations (was [cti-stix] [cti-cybox] Revoke Cybox Observable)
At the implementation level that would not change too much.
Instead of having

ObjA - RelatedObjB

U would have

ObjA - RelationshipStatement - ObjB

On Wednesday, 11 November 2015, Jordan, Bret <> wrote:

If we could just see a couple examples in say JSON, we could better follow what you mean.

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Blue Coat Systems

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Nov 11, 2015, at 11:34, Cory Casanave <> wrote:

I would think the same way your code “RelatedIndicatorType” now. You make a class for the relationship and property methods for the ends. Perhaps the difference is that other relationship objects can reference such a relationship so you can “make statements about the statements”.

 

My code tends to be generic and model driven so I don’t want to confuse you. I could hack some code if you like, but  the STIX python library is probably close.
Next in thread → Next in month →