On 23.11.2015 17:22:16, Trey Darley wrote:
>
> I don't insist on nanoseconds. I thought there was demand and since
> the bits are cheap, why not futureproof? Since it seems I misread the
> general consensus, let's standardize on nanoseconds and be done with
> it. The point is a) let's have one clear way to do it and b) let's
> take a decision so we can move on to other topics.
>
Sorry, fumblefingers, s/standardize on nanoseconds/standardize on milliseconds/g
--
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"There's never enough time. Thank you for yours." --Dan Geer
