Re: [cti-stix] Timestamps - Proposal

From
Patrick Maroney
Date
2015-12-01T19:57:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [cti-stix] Timestamps - Proposal
Bret,

  Presume you will be collecting, coordinating and documenting these so I'll respond directly to your initial message vs. jumping into the the Thread:

  2) Timestamps MUST use the timezone offset

  Question:  Does this mean there will be another Time Specification for _expression_ of relative time, periodicity and intervals?

  4) There will be an optional precision field (timestamp-precision) with the following string values: year, month, day, hour, minute, second. If precision is omitted, the default value of precision is "microsecond"

  Question:  Since extending beyond RFC 3339, why can't this option precision type enumeration include millisecond, microsecond, and nanosecond?

Patrick Maroney
  Office:  (856)983-0001
Cell:      (609)841-5104

President
  Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc.
  PO Box 569
Marlton, NJ 08053