I think that was the general consensus on the Slack chat....
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Barnum, Sean D.
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 2:04 PM
To: John-Mark Gurney <>; Wunder, John A. <>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Report object approaches
I would strongly suggest that there should be NO limits on what sort of TLOs could be in a Report.
sean
On 2/18/16, 2:00 PM, " on behalf of John-Mark Gurney" < on behalf of > wrote:
>Wunder, John A. wrote this message on Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 17:10 +0000:
>> We had a discussion on Slack about the Report object yesterday and I wanted to summarize for those of you who don’t want to read a 500msg back and forth. The people involved were myself, Bret Jordan, Jason Keirstead, Mark Davidson, Rich Piazza, John Mark-Gurney, and Sean Barnum.
>>
>> The topic of discussion was how you relate objects to a report, and there were essentially four options that were discussed:
>
>[...]
>
>> 2. The report contains a title, description, other TLO properties, and a list of idrefs for the content that the producer says are “in” the report.
>
>I'm in favor of this...
>
>I do have a question though... Are there limits to which TLO's are
>included? I ask because could you possibly include a COA in it? and
>if so, you'd want to add a relationship object to associate it w/ an
>indicator... If so, relationship objects would be allowed, and in
>reality, it'd just be that reprot relationship objects would not exist..
>
>[...]
>
>--
>John-Mark
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
