On 21.09.2017 20:38:53, Bret Jordan wrote:
> For example, we have talked a lot over the past year that Patterning
> might be best on its own as well.
>
Bret -
I take issue with your statement. By my reckoning I've heard the
suggestion made that we might spin STIX Patterning off into it's own
SC exactly *once*. Citation needed, please.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"E pur si muove!" --Galileo Galilei
