On 20.09.2017 19:26:15, Wunder, John A. wrote:
> I agree with this.
>
> All, to sum up a long conversation we (myself, Bret, Andras,
> Alexandre, Sean, Jason) had on Slack…it seems like people are
> converging around the following option:
>
>
> * Add a new SDO called “Grouping” (two object approach)
> * Grouping will not have a separate status or published field.
> Instead, we’ll have a label with the name “unverified”, and in the
> specification it will be explicitly defined as unverified
> information that the producer considers too preliminary to
> automate on.
> * No changes to Report
>
We've collectively burned a ton of cycles on this topic. While I
remain unconvinced by the arguments that an additional SDO is
necessary, it seems like we could just flip a coin and either outcome
would be fine.
In the interest of moving on to other pressing topics, I support the
Grouping proposal John put forward.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"Conservative, n.: One who admires radicals centuries after they're
dead." --Leo Rosten
