Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Re: Update links

From
Back, Greg <>
Date
2018-01-22T19:42:50+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Re: Update links
I don't think we should assume that just because STIX 2.0 exists that no one needs STIX 1.x documentation. I certainly agree that we want people who end up at stixproject.github.io to know that STIX 2.0 exists, and I think it does that
 well enough (the red banner is on every page of the site). There may also be lawyerly reasons why we can't just migrate the current content on stixproject.github.io to the cti-documentation site.

 

In summary, I'm not seeing a compelling reason to change anything on stixproject.github.io. Duncan made a PR to cti-documentation, which I accepted.

 

Thanks,

Greg

 

 

On 2018-01-21, 19:48, "Bret Jordan" <> wrote:

 

Yes, I agree. The base project of STIXProject.github.io should be for the new STIX and TAXII 2.x content.  The old STIX and TAXII 1.x should be "archived" away.  

 

Bret

From: Jason Keirstead <>

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:37:07 PM

To: 

Cc: Bret Jordan; Back, Greg; 

Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Re: Update links 

 

One thing we should consider IMO is making the root URL of
stixproject.github.io
 simply do a full redirect, and move the current index to a /stix1 URL or something.

Sent from IBM Verse

 --- [cti-stix] Re: Update links ---

 

From:



To:

"Bret Jordan" <>, "Back, Greg" <>, 

Date:

Fri, Jan 19, 2018 12:42 PM

Subject:

[cti-stix] Re: Update links

 

Bret,

It does; thank you. Your first link is where I eventually found it. I say eventually because I didn't have your email yet, but after google search failed, I did
 try searching for STIX on OASIS site which surprisingly also failed (throws an error, I have informed OASIS) so I went to CTI TC site and got to your first link.

 

Your second link is the one I was complaining about needing to be updated.  Greg's reply showed me how I could fix it myself which hopefully I'll get around to
 doing that.

 

I didn't have the latter two links you provided, so I appreciate getting those.

 

Thanks again.

 

Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting LLC

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

 

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Update links

From: Bret Jordan <>

Date: Fri, January 19, 2018 10:31 am

To: "Back, Greg" <>, Duncan <>,

"" <>

Duncan,

 

I believe you can find this content you are looking for via the OASIS site, url below, in section "Technical Work Produced by the Committee"

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cti/

 

We also have this site:

https://oasis-open.github.io/cti-documentation/

 

John Wunder did this site:

https://johnwunder.github.io/stix2-docs/?json#introduction

 

And here is a TC list of all of the documents that are approved or being worked on by the TC:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yvqWaPPnPW-2NiVCLqzRszcx91ffMowfT5MmE9Nsy_w/edit#heading=h.8bbhgdisbmt

 

Please let me know if this helps.

 

Bret

From:
 <> on behalf of Back, Greg <>

Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 8:12:37 AM

To: Duncan; 

Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Update links

 

Yes, Duncan, you're absolutely right.  I noticed this a couple months ago and created
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/Lb52_OlbMkRuWQXcTdX95IDscajQ6wFTfvGCTl6Ep7s=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Foasis-open%2Fcti-documentation%2Fissues%2F47.
 We haven't had a chance to fix it, but if you're interested, I'd gladly merge a Pull Request that makes that change.

 

In terms of OASIS and SEO, I'd want to get more information/advice from OASIS staff, but I'm happy to help implement anything on the documentation
 site based on their suggestions.

 

Thanks,

Greg

 

 

On 2018-01-19, 08:18, "
 on behalf of Duncan" <
 on behalf of > wrote:

 

Apologies if this is already on a to-do list or if it opens a can of worms already argued and resolved.

I went to go look something up in STIX on a device I don’t normally use so had to find it ‘from scratch’.

I google searched and all the top items were ads from STIX vendors, which may be a good thing but from OASIS viewpoint you may want to
 consider doing something to get moved up the list when people actually want to find the standard.

 

I clicked on the highest non-vendor link and ended up on the ‘old’ site from which I clicked on the reference to STIX 2.0 and got to

https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/f2ekh5aJbKNwXIYgLz4PDhrk2T8yTxf6pCmD-2x2W4w=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Foasis-open.github.io%2Fcti-documentation%2F

which is under the control of this mailing list. From there I clicked to

https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/w4rMfGTwVq_zirZR4moG-NPlU8cs6PpGLmGv0K2p7-k=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Foasis-open.github.io%2Fcti-documentation%2Fresources%23stix-20-specification

 which purports to be the STIX 2.0 Specification but brings me to a google doc which is a working doc.

 

Shouldn’t it bring me to the now approved Spec instead of a working doc? 

 

iPhone, iTypo, iApologize

 

Duncan Sparrell

sFractal Consulting, LLC

The closer you look, the more you see

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/5e_6CcFS_R2n_whfn33T70ycn-4rc9XTYZyUH3r2njw=?d=bevzypt3J9NexEAOA07hiIumMmP18mHg2com6Rm3FF63RX26ULr5X07Ldi8pMIPoXdt1kEU025cV_uM-dSaALVVnRBgnWz8kCOElrLG9E6R_sYqkFFay2pRAfKSEfr8IOfkSRFZXhD2pzieyBOujE-fz4TAZ6ZlWNvLAy4UYKCehcF_xEJzSe0qVRT7OADl0BdhKXSHXF4l808fKhUKpy2s4EG2dS0KytL-06AydH_bQRSJi-iQsY5avb88t-w8AAr5k8ubItY8L0YysYHs2RE6OL3s0U1XsF0EhwCAyZkVqd02O_b-HhHwaW4Sne9c3mucxpmrHKnjP8yLBxC_QaPXQmjVYV3IGPmgnT8pJ6B6oXPUVkD7HUIZpIi0PZxM_y4YyziJ8bfKmD68Cxef95hJYAQR1KNTknbY%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oasis-open.org%2Fapps%2Forg%2Fworkgroup%2Fportal%2Fmy_workgroups.php