Duncan,
I believe you can find this content you are looking for via the OASIS site, url below, in section "Technical Work Produced by the Committee"
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cti/
We also have this site:
https://oasis-open.github.io/cti-documentation/
John Wunder did this site:
https://johnwunder.github.io/stix2-docs/?json#introduction
And here is a TC list of all of the documents that are approved or being worked on by the TC:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yvqWaPPnPW-2NiVCLqzRszcx91ffMowfT5MmE9Nsy_w/edit#heading=h.8bbhgdisbmt
Please let me know if this helps.
Bret
From: <> on behalf of Back, Greg <>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 8:12:37 AM
To: Duncan;
Subject: [EXT] Re: [cti-stix] Update links
Yes, Duncan, you're absolutely right. I noticed this a couple months ago and created https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/Lb52_OlbMkRuWQXcTdX95IDscajQ6wFTfvGCTl6Ep7s=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Foasis-open%2Fcti-documentation%2Fissues%2F47.
We haven't had a chance to fix it, but if you're interested, I'd gladly merge a Pull Request that makes that change.
In terms of OASIS and SEO, I'd want to get more information/advice from OASIS staff, but I'm happy to help implement anything on the documentation site based on their suggestions.
Thanks,
Greg
On 2018-01-19, 08:18, " on behalf of Duncan" < on behalf of
> wrote:
Apologies if this is already on a to-do list or if it opens a can of worms already argued and resolved.
I went to go look something up in STIX on a device I don’t normally use so had to find it ‘from scratch’.
I google searched and all the top items were ads from STIX vendors, which may be a good thing but from OASIS viewpoint you may want to consider doing something to get moved up the list when people actually want to find the standard.
I clicked on the highest non-vendor link and ended up on the ‘old’ site from which I clicked on the reference to STIX 2.0 and got to
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/f2ekh5aJbKNwXIYgLz4PDhrk2T8yTxf6pCmD-2x2W4w=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Foasis-open.github.io%2Fcti-documentation%2F
which is under the control of this mailing list. From there I clicked to
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/w4rMfGTwVq_zirZR4moG-NPlU8cs6PpGLmGv0K2p7-k=?d=81r6jUm3z4KlQkgBPmDAOGKjxS5hLbmG839uwZ96AbInzC0d72svKcJY7qKdwOf5GlM8RacryX8T860ejrYDrLU6P0-lMA73wqISDqDQ5H0fby7PYlp-rJVETKLwJfsuVlIBl6sMWsLW6YdbQQ61fW60XYWJ0SWB76t3HbFq6UMHY9MH_V8Fg10p5fFFc9Mqd_6GYKBZj7x9g_6b13kPRXdBTEF2rWgcJ1EyHzqEcRbJCRFWxuJqq6LRmV_HlZCJetJG0pAN0P6C3KtYSGszuRA0GPZEmBsAqF5e_JP1GY06nXex04lvlG_pDBrjRNg6GA3tjImq8am1NPUyJ-BwCrl5uqxqwt6MGSD3tfcSCPAQAWSAnTv3LmvoMGDKGXNesKKdI7ZtX1udhOODsb4IH5xEvnIlop3_Pf2e5qP_jA%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Foasis-open.github.io%2Fcti-documentation%2Fresources%23stix-20-specification
which purports to be the STIX 2.0 Specification but brings me to a google doc which is a working doc.
Shouldn’t it bring me to the now approved Spec instead of a working doc?
iPhone, iTypo, iApologize
Duncan Sparrell
sFractal Consulting, LLC
The closer you look, the more you see
