Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments
Koji â thanks for the confirmation. Regarding the intentional blank. Are you suggesting we need to make a change to the template document ? Please clarify. For other organizations awareness. These documents have yet to be formally approved by the TC and STIXPreferred program requires that they are approved. After the next TC monthly meeting there will be a ballot for TC-approval of the documents. If you need more time for your organization (and particularly your legal counsel) to review the documents please consider doing that now rather than waiting until the ballot comes out. regards Allan Thomson CTO (+1-408-331-6646) LookingGlass Cyber Solutions From: Interoperability Subcommittee <> on behalf of "Yamada, Koji" <> Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 6:53 PM To: "" <>, Allan Thomson <>, Ron Williams <>, "" <> Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee <>, "" <>, "" <> Subject: RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Hi Allan, It took a lot of time, our legal team (Fujitsu) reviewed the documents and it is OK except intentional blank (such as [admin-email-address]). Thank you. Regards, -------------------------------------------------- Fujitsu System Integration Laboratories Koji Yamada From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Masuoka, Ryusuke Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 10:31 AM To: 'Allan Thomson' <>; Ron Williams <>; Cc: ; ; Subject: [cti] RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Hi, Allan, Thank you. Got the idea and the sense of urgency. Will start working on immediately. Regards, Ryu From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Allan Thomson Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:13 PM To: Masuoka, Ryusuke/çå çä <>; Ron Williams <>; Cc: ; ; Subject: [cti] Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Ryu â Our goal is to ensure the TC has time to review and provide feedback on the documents. It does no one any good if we have documents/framework for STIX Preferred that are either not reviewed at all or worse not acceptable to the majority of the TC. My goal of setting up milestones for review was to initiate an urgency to getting legal teams involved as I know *exactly* how long some legal departments take to review documents. So thank you to everyone that has initiated that review quickly. For the ballot the tentative plan was to initiate the start of the ballot over the next couple of weeks. Allan Thomson CTO +1-408-331-6646 LookingGlass Cyber Solutions From: "" <> Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 6:46 PM To: Allan Thomson <>, Ron Williams <>, "" <> Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee <>, "" <>, "" <> Subject: RE: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Hi, Alan, When do you estimate the end of the ballot period? We will try our best to get it through our legal by then, but it usually takes a month (and already a day or two have already passedâ). Regards, Ryu From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Allan Thomson Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:56 PM To: Ron Williams <>; Cc: ; ; Subject: [cti] Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Hi Ron â The intent is that this 1 week period + the ballot period will allow overall sufficient time for review/comments. regards Allan From: Ron Williams <> Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM To: "" <> Cc: Allan Thomson <>, Interoperability Subcommittee <>, "" <>, "" <> Subject: Re: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Agree with Bret - especially if we engage our legal dept. Cheers! ~r | stsm | chief architect x-force exchange | master inventor | ibm | mobile +1.512.633.7711] "May you live as long as you want, and love as long as you live" - Robert Heinlein http://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com preferred contact: on Slack @ronwilliams ----- Original message ----- From: Bret Jordan <> Sent by: <> To: Allan Thomson <>, "" <>, "" <> Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee <> Subject: [cti-interoperability] Re: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2018 1:49 AM One week is not a sufficient amount of time. Bret From: <> on behalf of Allan Thomson <> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 5:15 PM To: ; Cc: Interoperability Subcommittee Subject: [EXT] [cti-interoperability] STIX Preferred Documents For Review/Comments All â I have posted 2 documents that have been drafted by OASIS legal team for Instructions on STIX Preferred program Terms of use on STIX Preferred program Please review these documents and if you have any comments or concerns please submit them to the Interop sub-committee by 19th March (1 week from today). SUGGESTION: Have your legal or GC teams also review these documents if you plan to have your organization participate in STIX Preferred. If you would prefer to raise your concerns in person please plan to attend the Interop sub-committee meetings on Weds 9am PST. Details are on Kavi. We plan to do a ballot on formal TC approval of these documents but we wanted to solicit feedback/comments before we do that. We expect the ballot to start sometime after 19th March. Allan Document Name: STIX Preferred Instructions Draft Description STIX Preferred Instructions Draft Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Document Name: STIX Preferred Terms of Use Draft Description STIX Preferred Terms of Use Draft Download Latest Revision Public Download Link
Next in thread →
Next in month →