And I should add SMTP, but I doubt there'll be broad support (perhaps none ;-). However, willing to make arguments for same.
Sent from Outlook
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:20 AM -0700, "Davidson II, Mark S" <
> wrote:
Which version of AMQP? =)
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Patrick Maroney
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:19 AM
To: ; Jordan, Bret <>
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] TAXII Protocol Shortlist
AMQP and potentially MQTT if you want to consider your vision of TAXII Clients on IoT.
Sent from
Outlook
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM -0700, "Jordan, Bret" <
> wrote:
We have three protocols on the short list...
HTTP/1.1
HTTP/2
ZMTP
Are there any others we should be actually thinking about or discussing? If so please suggest them. I would also like to start hearing pros and cons, discussion / debate about which one to use in the end. Once we come to a steady state on discussion, we can then proceed to a vote. Lets take the next few weeks to discuss this.. I really want to hear your opinions. We will also plan to also discuss this on our next community call, as we stated a few days ago.
We can not really move further on the future of TAXII, as lot of future decisions will be impacted by this one, until this initial decision gets made so lets discuss it and make a decision.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards
Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
On Aug 27, 2015, at 06:36, Davidson II, Mark S <
> wrote:
Sergey,
Is this the spec for zmtp: http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:37 ?
-Mark
