Personally I’m fine not having it in the header as well.
I just wanted to make sure that if we state something about header inclusion that its clear what is included or not.
allan
From:
Terry MacDonald <>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 3:20 PM
To: Allan Thomson <>
Cc: Mark Davidson <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [cti-taxii] Open question: Server and User-Agent headers
Hi,
I'm not sure why we would need a MUST for the server or user-agent. What benefits does this bring? We already have a MIME type that will cover this sort of information...do we really need it in the Server and User-Agent as well? Seems like
unneeded extra complication to me.
Cheers
Terry MacDonald
Chief Product Officer
M: +64 211 918 814
E:
W: www.cosive.com
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Allan Thomson <
> wrote:
Mark – when we say ‘specify TAXII implementation’ within the server or user-agent, can we be more prescriptive and define the exact value that should
be included?
Given that both server and user-agents will likely have multiple values in them (for shared services on the same server) then we will want to avoid
ambiguity and conflicts as much as possible.
[TAXII Servers] MUST
include ‘taxii /2.0’ within the Server: header
2.
[TAXII Clients] MUST include ‘taxii /2.0’ within the User-Agent: header
or similar.
allan
From:
<
> on behalf of Mark Davidson <
>
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 1:05 PM
To: " " <
>
Subject: [cti-taxii] Open question: Server and User-Agent headers
All,
In reviewing the TAXII specification, the editors came across a document suggestion that was discussed on the call, and no clear resolution was arrived
at.
The suggestion is that the following sentences be added to the conformance requirements for TAXII Server and TAXII Client, respectively:
1.
[TAXII Servers]
MUST specify TAXII implementation within the
Server:
header
2.
[TAXII Clients] MUST specify TAXII implementation within the User-Agent: header
I’d like to resolve this proposal with one of the following outcomes:
1.
Accept proposal as-is
2.
Accept a modification of the proposal
3.
Reject the proposal
Please let me know what you think.
Thank you.
-Mark
Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, proprietary,
or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, distributing, copying, or in any way using this
message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy and delete any copies you may have received.
