CybOX has many significant bases for an independent
existence. It is already regarded as a STIX plug-in - as
are many other potential structured expressions. It's
elegance and utility, however, goes far beyond STIX.
It should not be merged into a STIX subcommittee.
Last but not least, Phase I of the charter treats CybOX
as in independent platform.
--tony
On 2015-06-18 3:35 PM, Trey Darley
wrote:
I move to create two technical subcommittees:
representation and transport. I would like to see CybOX merged
into STIX. To me it makes absolutely no sense maintaining them
as separate standards. If we begin with separate STIX and CybOX
committees, the raison d'etre of the CybOX committee is likely
to become the maintenance of its own existence, human politics
being what it is. (Pun intended.)
We can always decide to keep STIX and CybOX separate
and spin up dedicated subcommittees but I would like to see us
start with one single representation subcommittee tasked with
deciding whether merging the two taxonomies into one makes
sense.
C
--
________________________________
Anthony
Michael Rutkowski
EVP, Industry
Standards & Regulatory Affairs
+1 703 999 8270
________________________________
Yaana
Technologies LLC
542 Gibraltar
Drive
Milpitas CA
95035 USA
