I am not in favor of an ISAO registry as part of this effort and see that as out of scope.
I say that from an ISAC and SCC perspective as I have watched Administrations change this and look to go around current efforts that they encouraged (PDD-63, HSPD-7, PPD-21).
Further there is an RFP and an RFC out on these issues and they pint to other processes/efforts.
Peter
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 14:35, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
>
> Hi Chet,
>
> It is fairly common for standards body
> secretariats to be tasked with registry
> functions. I don't know how many such
> registries the OASIS secretariat has
> established over the years. Minimally
> there is the persistent XML schema registry.
>
> There is a rather fundamental need to establish
> in conjunction with the CTI work, a ISOA
> registry as a means for STIX user communities
> to engage in discovery and self-organization.
> The Executive Order certainly encourages if not
> requires such activity. Given the considerable
> diversity of ISOAs globally, instantiating that
> function in the OASIS secretariat seems like a
> good way forward. CTI could find other alternatives,
> but the obvious and easiest solution is the one
> closest to home so to speak.
>
> --tony
>
>
>> On 2015-06-02 06:51 PM, Chet Ensign wrote:
>> Tony, that is an interesting observation. I'm not sure that a TC can
>> task OASIS with doing this but the TC itself could certainly become
>> the home for such a registry. I see the value of it...
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
