Don't get me wrong, I support Rich for *chair* 110%. I'm merely supporting the argument Pete put forward for a non-US co-chair.
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
++----------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Sent from my CRM-114 Discriminator
On Jun 11, 2015 5:11 PM, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
The world of international technical committees in
this sector contains numerous examples of chairs
from government agencies. Furthermore, Rich
is rather more than an agency representative in
this context. From both a substantive perspective
as well as effective leadership and "messaging,"
his chair position is important.
As someone who leads the ETSI equivalent activity,
(and formerly led the equivalent in ITU-T) Rich's
chair position probably enhances the global
assimilation of the CTI suite.
--tony
On 2015-06-11 10:45 AM, Trey Darley wrote:
<snip>
However, I suggest the following, especially for us 'Americans' to consider. We need to have another individual as a co-chair. Simply put, to not be something that OASIS is adopting only for the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
</snip>
--
________________________________
Anthony Michael Rutkowski
EVP, Industry Standards & Regulatory Affairs
+1 703 999 8270
________________________________
Yaana Technologies LLC
542 Gibraltar Drive
Milpitas CA 95035 USA
