I'll be able to tell you better after the upcoming
TC CYBER meeting where I'll be giving a presentation
on this topic. However, thus far, there seems only
appreciation for DHS moving forward here, and there
have been no adverse optics.
In the international cybersecurity activity, government
representatives - the CESG has begun to assume leading
roles, as has the MIIT in China.
Maybe as Phase 2 evolves and there is a clearer picture
of CTI platform evolution, an additional chair might be
appropriate. However, the introduction of sub-committees
and chairs for more specific use case and development
activities, will likely witness many additional chairs for
that work.
--tony
On 2015-06-11 11:15 AM, Trey Darley
wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I support Rich for *chair* 110%.
I'm merely supporting the argument Pete put forward for a non-US
co-chair.
--
________________________________
Anthony
Michael Rutkowski
EVP, Industry
Standards & Regulatory Affairs
+1 703 999 8270
________________________________
Yaana
Technologies LLC
542 Gibraltar
Drive
Milpitas CA
95035 USA
