RE: [cti] CTI TC Adoption and Interoperability SCs

From
Struse, Richard <>
Date
2015-07-06T19:39:28+00:00
ID
DE637B85E99BDF4DBA1D1C1DF89189397AC72E60@D2ASEPREA007
Thread
RE: [cti] CTI TC Adoption and Interoperability SCs
Makes sense.

If we (the CTI TC) focus on defining what interoperability means for
STIX/TAXII/CybOX and how to measure/verify it, that leaves the door open for
third-party organizations such as testing labs to conduct interoperability
tests using the CTI TC-defined benchmarks.

-----Original Message-----
From:  [mailto:] On Behalf
Of Eric Burger
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 3:18 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: [cti] CTI TC Adoption and Interoperability SCs

When I was Chair of the SPEECHSC IETF Work Group (speech server control), we
setup a self-reported interoperability matrix:
http://standardstrack.com/ietf/speechsc/MRCPv2-Plans.html

Same for LEMONADE (mobile messaging):
http://standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade/Lemonade-Plans.html

The idea is OASIS will *not* become the protocol police. That is too
expensive and carries unlimited liability. What a self-reporting resource
does do is (1) advertise who is running with the standards and (2) who has
tested against whom. That is not a guarantee of interoperability, but it is
lightyears ahead of publishing and praying.


> On Jul 6, 2015, at 2:31 PM, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
> 
> It would be useful if CTI maintained the equivalent of
> the MILE Implementation Report ID just announced below.
> 
> Additionally, in a world of dramatic scaling of cloud data
> center virtualization, especially NFV, instantiating a CTI
> dedicated focus on the subject is important.
> 
> --tony
> 
> ---------------
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-05
> 
> MILE C. Inacio
> Internet-Draft CMU
> Intended status: Informational                               D. Miyamoto
> Expires: January 6, 2016                                          UTokyo
> July 5, 2015
> 
> 
>                       MILE Implementation Report
>                   draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-05
> 
> 
> Abstract
> 
>   This document is a collection of implementation reports from vendors,
>   consortiums, and researchers who have implemented one or more of the
>   standards published from the IETF INCident Handling (INCH) and
>   Management Incident Lightweight Exchange (MILE) working groups.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>