Re: [cti] NFV and CTI relationships

Yes I concur that NFV should be followed/engaged
IETF i2nsf could be promising

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/i2nsf/charter/

On Wednesday, 22 July 2015, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
Hi Rich,

The attached cover sheet is for a set of materials

we are submitting into next week's NFV SEC

subcommittee meeting in San Jose.  The NFV

plenary and its various subcommittees are

meeting in the convention center.

As noted in the abstract, the contribution

describes the context and activities of the

TC CTI and includes mapping NFV

security requirements and work items into

the initial platforms being advanced by

TC CTI.  CybOX (and MAEC although not

presently under CTI) are especially relevant.

The intent is to create a formal relationship

as well as the basis for a work item on

the subject.  Given the specialized

nature of NFV, the work is probably best

done there.

If any CTI-ers are among the hundreds at

the NFV meetings next week, or otherwise

want to be a part of this work, let me know.

best,

tony