Re: [cti] Some additional thoughts on combining STIX and CybOX

On 18.03.2016 12:05:51, Mark Davidson wrote:
> 
> Can we talk through this on the upcoming Tuesday working session?
> 

I agree, Mark; this should be THE topic for tomorrow's working
session. We simply must put this issue to bed so we can move on.

> 
> For me, a key process that we need to define is how CybOX objects
> are managed. If we move toward this proposal, perhaps the CybOX SC
> can propose a process? I think that the process is going to be as
> important as the initial set of CybOX 3.0 objects.
> 

Ivan and I will dig into John Wunder's proposal and propose the
aforementioned process.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." --RFC 1925