Chet,
A basic question. Doesn't the Cybersecurity Information
Sharing Act of 2015 as organic law (and in Europe, the NIS
Directive) - both enacted into law in December - effectively
supersede whatever role this ISOA SO contract effort was
expected to play under the old EO? The entity itself
has no jurisdiction or authority. Put another way, isn't
the TC CTI itself fulfilling the principal purposes of the Act?
Do any of these materials have anything substantive
in them on which to comment? Just an inquiring
mind question.
--tony
On 2016-05-05 5:07 PM, Chet Ensign
wrote:
FYI, in case this was missed (I missed it initially):
