On 01.06.2018 17:12:35, Wunder, John A. wrote:
>
> Given that this discussion has died down again and we’ve spent a few
> weeks on it I move that we accept the prevailing opinion and use the
> *_types names. So please speak up if you object to this, otherwise
> (assuming this gets a second) the editors will go ahead and
> implement as *_types.
>
Seconded.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"Every networking problem always takes longer to solve than it seems
like it should." --RFC 1925
