Darrel,
I'm concerned that the "taxonomy" effort will duplicate
the effort of the DMTF/CIM potentially producing inconsistent
results. We should deal with CIM either incorporating it
or defining why not.
I would also like the document to be much shorter. You might
consider the impact if the purpose section stopped after the
first sentence in the second paragraph.
Fred
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Thomas, Darrel [mailto:]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:17 PM
>To: Sarah Barbuscia; ;
>;
>Cc:
>Subject: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on
>the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>Hello All,
>
>I've marked up the current charter with some minor changes.
>Please review for possible completion by CoB, Friday. Tim,
>would you look over the dates and let me know I'm being
>somewhat aggressive? I kinda want to put some urgent cadence
>behind this effort...
>
>Regards,
>jDT
>
>J. Darrel Thomas
>Distinguished SE
>Chief Technologist, Datacenter Services Portfolio Electronic
>Data Systems Corporation 5400 Legacy Drive Mail Stop H3-5A-34
>Plano, Texas 75024
>972-797-9695 (Office)
>972-679-5943 (Cell)
> (Email)
>
>"Of all the things I've lost, the one I miss the most is my mind..."
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private
>information. If you have received it in error, please notify
>the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use
>of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sarah Barbuscia [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:45 PM
>To:
>Cc:
>Subject: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter
>due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>
>Reminder:
>
>As discussed on Tuesday's teleconference, any comments on the
>TC charter are due to the mail list by EOD tomorrow, February
>10, 2006.
>
>Sarah
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 PM
>To:
>Subject: [dcml-frame] Proposed text of charter clarification ballot
>
> Would you please review the attached revisions that I've
>received as
>proposed amendments to the DCML Framework TC charter. (There are two
>identical documents attached here, in two formats, each marked to show
>changes from the current approved text.) Among other things,
> -- As you've discussed, these would rename the TC as the
>"DCML Configuration Management TC."
> -- These changes anticipate the practical equivalent of
>merging the Apps & Services TC into this one.
> -- New target dates should be inserted for the proposed
>clarified list of deliverables.
>
> If adopted this would qualify as a "charter
>clarification" under the OASIS TC Process. We can launch the
>ballot (as a web ballot on the TC's
>site) to approve it as soon as the new target dates are filled
>in, and we incorporate any consensual corrections to the proposal.
> Best regards JBC
>
>~ James Bryce Clark
>~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>~
>
>
