Carl,
ITIL is to provide use case examples. DCML expressions
(the XML) should not reference ITIL only the data that
ITIL processes deal with.
Fred
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carl Mattocks [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:21 PM
>To: Cummins, Fred A
>Cc: Thomas, Darrel; ;
>;
>; Sarah Barbuscia
>Subject: Re: [dcml-frame] RE: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame]
>REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>Fred:
>
>If DCML is going to reference ITIL in any way .. the taxonomy
>will be more than CIM.
>
>
>Carl Mattocks
>Consultant : ITIL Application Knowledge Management MetLife
>732 893 4170
>
>'Always look on the bright side of life' Monty Python
>
>
>
>
> "Cummins, Fred A"
>
> <fred.cummins@eds To:
>"Thomas, Darrel" <>
>
> .com> cc:
>"Sarah Barbuscia" <>,
>
>
>,
>,
> 03/02/2006 12:18
>
>
> PM Subject:
>[dcml-frame] RE: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER:
>Comments on
> the DCML
>charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Darrel,
>
>I still don't understand what you are looking for in a
>taxonomy that is not in CIM. In any event, the relationship to
>CIM should be clarified so there is not duplication.
>
>Some changes to the charter are suggested in the attached document.
>
>Fred
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Thomas, Darrel
>>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:30 AM
>>To: Cummins, Fred A; 'Sarah Barbuscia';
>>'';
>>''; ''
>>Cc: ''
>>Subject: RE: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER:
>>Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>>
>>Actually, I don't believe that the taxonomy that is reference here is
>>the same level of taxonomy that CIM would create in domain specific
>>implementations (i.e., SMIS, SMASH, etc.), but act as the
>overlay that
>>DCML is to provide, which the statement attempts to articulate. I
>>hearken back to my ecosystem slide which attempts to lay out
>the layers
>>of relationships between standards efforts and any work that is
>>articulated in the DCML efforts must be considered complementary and
>>expect to use these other standards as appropriate.
>>
>>I have no problem with shortening the charter, and this is an
>>opportunity to provide some feedback. Turn track changes on, and
>>provide something that we all can take a look at...
>>
>>Regards,
>>jDT
>>
>>J. Darrel Thomas
>>Distinguished SE
>>Chief Technologist, Datacenter Services Portfolio Electronic Data
>>Systems Corporation 5400 Legacy Drive Mail Stop H3-5A-34
>Plano, Texas
>>75024
>>972-797-9695 (Office)
>>972-679-5943 (Cell)
>> (Email)
>>
>>"Of all the things I've lost, the one I miss the most is my mind..."
>>
>>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have
>>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
>>the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Cummins, Fred A
>>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 9:11 AM
>>To: Thomas, Darrel; Sarah Barbuscia;
>>;
>>;
>>Cc:
>>Subject: RE: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER:
>>Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>>
>>Darrel,
>>
>>I'm concerned that the "taxonomy" effort will duplicate the effort of
>>the DMTF/CIM potentially producing inconsistent results. We should
>>deal with CIM either incorporating it or defining why not.
>>
>>I would also like the document to be much shorter. You might consider
>>the impact if the purpose section stopped after the first sentence in
>>the second paragraph.
>>
>>Fred
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Thomas, Darrel [mailto:]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 6:17 PM
>>>To: Sarah Barbuscia; ;
>>>;
>>>Cc:
>>>Subject: [dcml-appserv] RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments
>>on the DCML
>>>charter due by EOB Tomorrow
>>>
>>>Hello All,
>>>
>>>I've marked up the current charter with some minor changes.
>>>Please review for possible completion by CoB, Friday. Tim,
>would you
>>>look over the dates and let me know I'm being somewhat
>aggressive? I
>>>kinda want to put some urgent cadence behind this effort...
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>jDT
>>>
>>>J. Darrel Thomas
>>>Distinguished SE
>>>Chief Technologist, Datacenter Services Portfolio Electronic Data
>>>Systems Corporation 5400 Legacy Drive Mail Stop H3-5A-34
>>Plano, Texas
>>>75024
>>>972-797-9695 (Office)
>>>972-679-5943 (Cell)
>>> (Email)
>>>
>>>"Of all the things I've lost, the one I miss the most is my mind..."
>>>
>>>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>>>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>>If you have
>>>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately
>and delete
>>>the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Sarah Barbuscia [mailto:]
>>>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 5:45 PM
>>>To:
>>>Cc:
>>>Subject: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by
>>>EOB Tomorrow
>>>
>>>
>>>Reminder:
>>>
>>>As discussed on Tuesday's teleconference, any comments on the TC
>>>charter are due to the mail list by EOD tomorrow, February 10, 2006.
>>>
>>>Sarah
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 PM
>>>To:
>>>Subject: [dcml-frame] Proposed text of charter clarification ballot
>>>
>>> Would you please review the attached revisions that
>I've received
>>>as proposed amendments to the DCML Framework TC charter.
>>(There are two
>>>identical documents attached here, in two formats, each
>>marked to show
>>>changes from the current approved text.) Among other things,
>>> -- As you've discussed, these would rename the TC as the "DCML
>>>Configuration Management TC."
>>> -- These changes anticipate the practical equivalent of merging
>>>the Apps & Services TC into this one.
>>> -- New target dates should be inserted for the proposed
>clarified
>>>list of deliverables.
>>>
>>> If adopted this would qualify as a "charter
>clarification" under
>>>the OASIS TC Process. We can launch the ballot (as a web ballot on
>>>the TC's
>>>site) to approve it as soon as the new target dates are
>filled in, and
>>>we incorporate any consensual corrections to the proposal.
>>> Best regards JBC
>>>
>>>~ James Bryce Clark
>>>~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>>>~
>>>
>>>
>>
>(See attached file: dcml-config-mgmt-charter-FAC mods.rtf)
>
>The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL
>and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use,
>dissemination of the information, or copying of this message
>is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please
>notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
>
