> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joann Hackos [mailto:]
> Sent: Monday, 2010 August 02 9:14
> To: DITA Adoption TC
> Subject: [dita-adoption] Thoughts on DITA 1.2 adoption
>
> Hi All!
> At today's meeting could we discuss developing a basic list of DITA
1.2
> features that we would like to see adopted by editing and content
> management developers?
I'm not sure I understand.
Which features do we NOT want to see adopted by editing
and content management developers?
paul
>
> In asking about DITA 1.2 adoption in writing the status article, I got
> such diverse feedback from developers that I would like to have a
> standard list.
>
> Specializations
> Learning and Training
> Safety Hazard
> Machine Industry
>
> Keyref
> Conkeyref
> Conref Push
> Delayed conref resolution
>
> Referencing a range of elements
>
> Constraint mechanism
> Controlled values
> Taxonomy mechanism
> Acronym/glossary
>
> New linking capabilities in relationship tables
>
> All the new DTD capabilities such as
> <sectiondiv>
> <bodydiv>
> New map references
>
> I'd like to set something up that is like a checklist that vendors can
> go to and tell everyone what they have implemented (or the dates for
> implementation).
>
> JoAnn
