← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

LwDITA comments

From
Scott Prentice <>
Date
2017-11-28T20:19:34+00:00
ID
Thread
LwDITA comments
Looks great! So far, here's what I'm seeing ..

      

      General observations

      

      - For consistency, should this paper use the term "components"
      when referring to items like "Paragraph" and "elements" when
      talking about XML or HTML nodes (like "<p>")? In general the
      paper uses the term "elements" for both. Probably not terribly
      confusing to anyone, but technically "Paragraph" isn't an element
      (at least in my book).

      

      - Since there's no image/@placement attribute, I'm assuming that a
      fig/image implies @placement='break' and an image alone would be
      @placement='inline'. If that's correct, it might be worth mentioning.

      

      

      5.1.3 Example of an XDITA map

      

      - Since map/title isn't allowed (yes?), it might be worth
      explicitly noting the need for map/topicmeta/navtitle (this is a
      little odd, no?).

      

      - Also (might not be the right place for this comment) .. would be
      nice to have topicref/@processing-role so you can reference a
      resource-only submap of keydefs (since keydef is by default
      'resource-only', I guess this isn't necessary, but seems like it
      would make the intent more obvious).

      

      

      6 LwDITA tools

      

      - Since other tools are listed, it would be great to also include
      DITA-FMx as an early adopter of LwDITA. Something like this ..

      

      ----

    Adobe FrameMaker with Leximation DITA-FMx v.2.0.06 or later

    

        DITA-FMx 2.0.06 supports the authoring and publishing of LwDITA
    (XDITA) map and topic models in FrameMaker versions 7.2 through FM
    2017. 

    ----

    

    

    7.3 DITA 1.3 attributes in LwDITA

    

    - Need bold on "Filtering attribute" subhead within the table.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread