CSH Proposal

Colleagues

I received some feedback on the CSH proposal from Paul Masalsky and the EMC
documentation team.

One of their suggestions was to change the name of the "yield-to-topic"
attribute to "override-in-topic". Do you think this would make the meaning
of the attribute clearer? Or is there another name that would work better?

Another suggestion is that the yield-to-topic attribute default would be
false. (In other words, if the attribute was omitted from the map,
processors would assume that the map context hooks would not be overridden
by any in the topic.) Any thoughts on this? How would this affect aliases,
do you think? Should no explicit yield-to-topic alternatively mean that both
the topic's hook and the map's topicref hook should both be included as
context ids?

Tony