HI all.
While migrating sample content to Lw DITA to test the new Marketing specialization, we ran into the limitation that there is no footnote in the schema. I understand that 'scope-creep' is always a risk, but still it feels that a footnote is a pretty versatile requirement? It wouldn t feel logical to put this in a specialization?
I am not sure if this is the right way to express such findings, so my second question is more procedure-related: what is the correct way to communicate such RFC's?
Cheers!
Jan
