Re: Do we need multi-level specialization?

From
Michael Priestley <>
Date
2016-06-27T00:59:37+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Do we need multi-level specialization?
OK I've had one vote on this, saying they
don't need multi-level specialization.

Anyone else have input?

Do the learning and training specializations
depend on more than one level?

Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist

http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley

From:      
 Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM
To:      
 
Date:      
 06/14/2016 01:35 PM
Subject:    
   Do we need multi-level
specialization?

In our last call we were struggling
with how to represent multiple levels of inheritance in Lightweight DITA,
especially in non-XML forms like HTML5 and Markdown.

But backing up a bit, Don asked the
question: do we even really need multiple levels in Lightweight?

Do we have any examples where multi-level
specialization would be required? That is, any examples where a specialization
would need to be based off another existing specialization, rather than
off of elements in topic or map.

Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Enterprise Content Technology Strategist

http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley