Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey

From
Mark Giffin <>
Date
2016-06-27T04:08:35+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita-lightweight-dita] Thoughts on a survey
Michael,

      

      This looks pretty good to me. For #2 authoring roles, I have run
      across people who have the word "analyst" in their title. This
      could be almost anything of course, but when I see it they are
      usually doing some writing. I have a few of them at one client
      using DITA. So you might add "Analysts" to the list.

      

      Mark Giffin

      Mark Giffin Consulting, Inc.

      http://markgiffin.com/

      

      On 6/26/2016 5:42 PM, Michael Priestley wrote:

    

    Any feedback from
        anyone else? Rahel, have
        you had a chance to give it a look over?

      

        Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)

        Enterprise Content Technology Strategist

        

      http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley

      

      

      

      From:      
         Michael
        Priestley/Toronto/IBM

      To:      
         Carlos Evia
        <>

      Cc:      
         

      Date:      
         06/21/2016 01:29 PM

      Subject:    
           Re:
        [dita-lightweight-dita]
        Thoughts on a survey

      

      

      Hi Carlos,

      

      For #1 - sounds good - maybe
        still worth
        including the link as well, for those willing to spend the time
        on it,
        but shouldn't be a prereq for the survey

      

      For 2 and 3 - I was thinking
        they'd
        be providing examples, of the content they're currently
        publishing from
        DITA or want to publish from DITA. And ok by me to add
        translators.

      

      For 6 - agreed

      

      For 7 - ok - need to make this
        part
        easy to skip for folks who aren't interested in/familiar with
        specialization

      

        Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)

        Enterprise Content Technology Strategist

        

      http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley

      

      

      

      

      From:      
         Carlos Evia
        <>

      To:      
         Michael
        Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
        

      Date:      
         06/20/2016 08:48 PM

      Subject:    
           Re:
        [dita-lightweight-dita]
        Thoughts on a survey

      Sent by:    
           <>

      

      

      

      Hi Michael (and all),

      

      Thanks for starting this.I have a few notes and
        observations
        here as we prepare for Monday’s call.

      - Do we want to collect any demographic information
        before
        getting into the core Lightweight DITA questions?

      - For #1, how about instead of giving an external
        link
        we write  a concise (couple of paragraphs) definition of
        Lightweight
        DITA borrowing from your original blog post, our STC article,
        and the DITA
        NA presentations? I am happy to work on a draft of it and share.
      

      - For #2 and #3, do you mean we are providing the
        optional
        examples or we are expecting them to provide their examples?

      - For #2 and #3, add translators to list.

      - For #6, provide descriptions/definitions of each
        tag.

      - For  #7, maybe use your example of to-dos from
        the DITA NA slides to explain Lightweight DITA specialization.

      

      After Monday’s call I can work on this with input
        from
        the SC. Like I mentioned before, this is very relevant to my
        current research
        project (expanding my analysis of DITA through Computational
        Thinking;
        IEEE paper published last fall attached to this message for
        information/entertainment
        of SC’s members who have not seen it), so I can put some time
        into it.
        And we can host it in Virginia Tech’s Qualtrics survey
        implementation.

      

      Looking forward to Monday’s call.

      

      Carlos

      

      

      -- 

      Carlos Evia, Ph.D.

      Director of Professional and Technical Writing

      Associate Professor of Technical Communication

      Department of English

      Center for Human-Computer Interaction

      Virginia Tech

      Blacksburg, VA 24061-0112

      (540)200-8201

      

      

      

      

      On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Michael Priestley <>
        wrote:

      

      How about this for dita-users:

      

        1 - link to overview/description of lightweight DITA for them to
        review
        first

      

        2 - Which of the following authoring roles are creating DITA
        today in your
        organization?

        (multiple-select list, option to provide example url for each
        one selected,
        option to provide examples of content types for each one
        selected)

        - Designers

        - Developers

        - Marketing authors

        - Salespeople

        - Product documentation authors

        - Embedded assistance authors

        - Trainers

        - Support

        - Subject experts

        - Internal policy/procedure authors

        - Other

      

        3 - Which content areas are you considering Lightweight DITA
        for?

        (same list as above, with same options)

      

        4 - What source formats are important for your use of LW DITA?

        XML

        Markdown

        HTML

        JSON

        Word

        Other (write-in)

      

        5 - What delivery formats are important for your use of LW DITA?

        HTML

        PDF

        EPUB

        JSON

        Word

        Other (write-in)

      

        6 - Is anything missing from the following list of block-level
        elements
        in LW DITA?

        p

        ul

        ol

        dl

        pre

        audio

        video

        simpletable

        fig

        note

        fn

        [write-in field after showing the above]

      

        7 - If you are planning to specialize, which of the following
        capabilities
        are must-haves?

        - nesting div structures for deep containment specializations

        - base attribute for arbitrary attribute definition

        - multiple-level specialization (ability to specialize off other
        specializations,
        not just topic) 

      

        8 - Which of the following benefits/features of LW DITA matter
        to you?

        - Simpler XML authoring

        - HTML5 authoring

        - Markdown authoring

        - Easier specialization

        - Easier tools development

        - Cross-silo content sharing

        - Cross-silo tool sharing

        - Other (write-in)

      

        9 - is it ok to contact you for followup? 

        email address

        

        Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)

        Enterprise Content Technology Strategist

        

        http://dita.xml.org/blog/michael-priestley