← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Minutes from 2017-02-20 LW DITA meeting

From
Rahel Anne Bailie <>
Date
2017-03-06T14:08:25+00:00
ID
Thread
Minutes from 2017-02-20 LW DITA meeting
Fellow committee members, I made the mistake of leaving the clean-up of my notes too long, and now have limited recall to supplement the notes I took. Please look these over carefully for an errors or omissions.

Present:

Michael
Priestley

Jan
Benedictus

Don Day

Kris
Eberlein

Carlos
Evia

Mark
Giffin

Tim
Grantham

Alan
Houser

John Hunt

Rahel Bailie 

 

The
committee welcomed Alan Houser as an individual member.

 

Motion to
approve minutes of previous meeting:

Moved by
Michael Priestley.

Seconded
by John Hunt.

 

Revise
timeline and activity for release and specification of draft

The draft
outline is under review, particularly around "note".

The fn
and fnref specializations are outstanding.

Michael
Priestley will locate information that outlines the explicit approved design.

 

Update
about the transform

Tim
Grantham commented that development is pending discussion from other areas to
be resolved - for example, the specroll attribute.

More work
needs to be done on the template transform to the DTD.

Specname
was being specialized from base.

 

Discussion
about spectitle

Don Day
queries a use for spectitle. Spectitle is available on section, and could be in
trouble with output class. Spectitle is available on multiple elements but not
on every element needed.

The
semantics are also different. Spectitle intended for specialised sections with
a generated title.

 

Discussion
about domain testing

Jan
Benedictus will check with Birgit Strackenbrock, as no changes seem to have
happened on the testing side of the specialization.

 

Learning
and training specialization

John Hunt
was asked whether he had looked at how to write up the LW learning and topic
types. John will revisit and get a note out before next call.

 

Specialization
and web service setup

Neither
specialization nor web service setup made the cut. 

They are
with Tim Grantham, who has not made any information available.

Don Day
has an instance running on Expedita, using previous version of Tim's transform.

Don is
unable to re-integrate it into an authoring environment for anyone to use. As a
result, he will not be setting it up because there is no capable editor set up
for it.

 

Committee
note workstream

Carlos
Evia has created an outline.

 

Element
description

Carlos
Evia has a skeleton of what the spec will look like. He stopped developing it
until the committee note is ready.

 

Kris
Eberlein says that the Technical Committee is ready to start work on the design
of the spec. The subcommittee needs to get a draft ready of the LW DITA design.
Work on the spec comes after that.

 

Complete
committee note for topic spec for XML

Carlos
Evia has questions about the committee note and about maps. He needs to know
what maps are expected to do and how they're simplified from full DITA. Content
is needed to test this.

 

How to
map fn to DITA. 

Will
fnref be a domain? It is an xref with domain specfialization.

 

There
needs to be a topic of introducing fnref as part of the design, as a separate
topic to cover fnref.

 

Map
specification

Specialization
for maps is going into a separate work stream.

The
committee wants to set it up as web review before going to the committee.

When
should a review of the design document be done for the subcommittee? Aim for
Mar 6, by the next subcommittee meeting.

 

There is
great value in having map and topic being part of the release.

This
could be cut to enable a smaller release.

It would
be helpful if map could be represented in an authoring format.

It was
suggested that Carlos Evia seed the draft with concerns and get feedback from
members.

Carlos
agreed to have a version for the next subcommittee meeting.

 

Simpler
content model

Jan
Benedictus questioned the use of the word "strict". The content of
the topic needs to be tweaked.

 

Use of
YAML front matter

It makes
sense to allow the author the flexibility to determine whether the short
description should always be the first paragraph or not.

A
question was raised about how pervasive is YAML is in Markdown communities.

Carlos
Evia moved that we use YAML markup to distinguish when the first paragraph is
or isn't a short description in MDITA.

Mark
Giffin seconded the motion.

Alan
Houser stated that he would like to defer the issue.

Resolved:
Put YAML in the draft for subcommittee review, with provision for discussion by
subcommittee.

Go to
current version (draft 7, page 19, section 4.3.2) to see an example and
explanation.

Mark
Giffin will do a review.

 

Meeting
concluded at 2 PM EST.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →