AW: AW: Review on the DITA 1.2 Machine Industry DTDs and XSDs

Hi Eric,

 

1) the directory will be 
technicalContent

2) taskreq-d-prereq sounds reasonable to 
me

 

Robert - what do you 
think?

 

Best 
regards

 

Chris

Von: Eric Sirois [mailto:] 

Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Oktober 2008 02:56
An: Christian 
Kravogel
Cc: ; 'Robert D 
Anderson'
Betreff: Re: AW: Review on the DITA 1.2 Machine Industry 
DTDs and XSDs

Hi Chris, 

A couple of follow-up questions if I may. 

1) Which directory will contain the 
taskRequirementDomain.xsd base or technicalContent? 
2) What is the prefix for the domain? The mitask was the 
old one (mitask-d-prereq ).  Is taskreq what you have in mind (taskreq-d-prereq and 
taskreq-d-postreq? 

Eric

Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer 
DB2 
Universal Database - Information Development
DITA Migration and Tools 
Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: 
Phone:(905) 413-2841
Blue Pages (Internal)

"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public 
information and government 
transactions avoid depending on technologies that 
imply or impose a specific product or 
platform on businesses or citizens" - 
EU on XML-based office document formats. 

  
  

    From: 
    "Christian Kravogel" 
      <> 
  

    To: 
    Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
  

    Cc: 
    <>, "'Robert D 
      Anderson'" <> 
  

    Date: 
    10/16/2008 10:23 AM 
  

    Subject: 
    AW: Review on the DITA 1.2  Machine 
      Industry DTDs and XSDs

Eric 
  
  
At the meetings on August 26th and September 2nd we posted the 
decision of the SC to rename machine industry task to machinerytask and to 
support the proposal of Michael Priestly to rename the machineIndustryDomain to 
taskRequirementsDomain. 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/200808/msg00045.html 

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/200809/msg00001.html 

  
At the 
meeting on the 23rd of September we made the final DITA 1.2 decission on the 
packaging question. 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/200809/msg00025.html 

There we decided not to have a machine 
industry package in DITA 1.2. All domains, mod's and constrains files became 
part of the technical package. (hazardstatement, taskrequirements and 
machinerytask) 
  
there might be the possibility that we will have a machinery 
package with DITA 1.3 but I guess the domains hazardstatement and 
taskrequirements will remain on the technical package level due to their wider 
use. 
  
So I would recommend the following urn's: 
<system systemId=urn:oasis:names:tc:dita:xsd:hazardstatementDomain.xsd:1.2 uri="hazardstatementDomain.xsd"/> (as it already is) 
<system 
systemId=urn:oasis:names:tc:dita:xsd:taskRequirementsDomain.xsd:1.2 uri="taskRequirementsDomain.xsd"/> (based on the new proposed naming) 
<system systemId=urn:oasis:names:tc:dita:machinery:xsd:machineryTask.xsd:1.2 uri="machinerytask.xsd"/> (based on the new proposed 
naming) 
<system systemId=urn:oasis:names:tc:dita:machinery:xsd:machineryTaskbodyConstraintMod.xsd:1.2 
uri="machineryTaskbodyConstraintMod.xsd"/> (based on the new proposed 
naming) 
  
If someone from the Machine Industry SC would like to have the urn's 
differently, please reply. 
  
Best regards 
  

Chris 

  
  

SeicoDyne GmbH 
Eichenstrasse 16 
CH-6015 
Reussbühl 
Switzerland 
Tel: +41 41 534 66 97 
Mob: 
+41 78 790 66 97 
Skype: seicodyne 

  
www.seicodyne.com 
 
  
Member of the 
DITA Technical Committee 
Chairman of 
the DITA Machine Industry Subcommittee 
  

Von: Eric Sirois [mailto:] 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2008 15:07
An: Christian 
Kravogel
Cc: ; 'Robert D 
Anderson'
Betreff: Re: Review on the DITA 1.2 Machine Industry DTDs 
and XSDs

Hi 
Chris, 

Thanks 
for the taking the time to review the Machine Industry DTD and XSDs. I will 
update the XSDs soon and post the a XSD package at OASIS. 

I have a  quick question for 
you and your SC.  For the XSD I created a URN as unique identifier. 
 As part of the design pattern URN I need a name for the specialization. 
 I use "machine" as the specialization identifier.  Does that work for 
you and the SC or is there a better token that you would prefer. 

Kind regards, 
Eric 

<system systemId="urn:oasis:names:tc:dita:spec:machine:xsd:machineIndustry.xsd:1.2"
    uri="machineIndustry.xsd"/>

Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer 
DB2 
Universal Database - Information Development
DITA Migration and Tools 
Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: 
Phone:(905) 413-2841
Blue Pages (Internal)

"Transparency and accessibility 
requirements dictate that public information and government 
transactions 
avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a specific product or 

platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document 
formats. 

  
  

    From: 
    "Christian Kravogel" 
      <> 
  

    To: 
      
    "'Robert D Anderson'" 
      <>, Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
  

    Cc: 
    <> 
  

    Date: 
      
    10/14/2008 01:51 PM 
      
  

    Subject: 
    Review on the DITA 1.2  Machine 
      Industry DTDs and XSDs

Robert, Eric 
 
at the DITA Machine 
Industry TC meeting today we reviewed the DTDs and XSDs and we found some ";)?" 
who should not be there. Guess I made this mistake when I prepared the DTD 
file. 
 
Attached 
the corrected files. 
 
These are the modifications we made: 

 
Line 294 

old: 
<!ENTITY % supplies.content 
"((%nosupply;)? 
| 
(%supplyli;)?)" 
new: 
<!ENTITY % supplies.content 
"((%nosupply;) | 

(%supplyli;))" 
 
line 356: 
old: 
<!ENTITY % spares.content 
"((%nospares;)? 
| 
(%sparesli;)?)" 
 
new: 
<!ENTITY % spares.content 
"((%nospares;) | 

(%sparesli;))" 
 
line 418: 
old 
<!ENTITY % safety.content 
"((%nosafety;)? 
| 
(%safecond;)?)"> 
 
new 
<!ENTITY % safety.content 

"((%nosafety;) | 
(%safecond;))"> 

In the mitaskdomain.xsd schema it is the same 
correction: 

line 519: 
old: 
<xs:complexType name="supplies.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nosupply" minOccurs="0"/> 
 <xs:group ref="supplyli" minOccurs="0"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
new: 

<xs:complexType 
name="supplies.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nosupply"/> 
 <xs:group ref="supplyli"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
line 616: 

old: 
<xs:complexType name="spares.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nospares" minOccurs="0"/> 
 <xs:group ref="sparesli" minOccurs="0"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
new: 
<xs:complexType name="spares.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nospares"/> 
 <xs:group ref="sparesli"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
line 713: 
old: 
<xs:complexType name="safety.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nosafety" minOccurs="0"/> 
 <xs:group ref="safecond" minOccurs="0"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
new: 

<xs:complexType 
name="safety.content"> 
<xs:choice> 
 <xs:group ref="nosafety"/> 
 <xs:group ref="safecond"/> 
</xs:choice> 
</xs:complexType> 
 
SeicoDyne 
GmbH 
Eichenstrasse 
16 
CH-6015 
Reussbühl 
Switzerland 
Tel: +41 41 534 66 97 
Mob: +41 78 790 66 97 
Skype: seicodyne 
 
www.seicodyne.com 

 
 
Member of the DITA Technical 
Committee 
Chairman 
of the DITA Machine Industry Subcommittee 

[attachment "mitaskDomain.mod" deleted by Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM] 
[attachment "mitaskDomain.xsd" deleted by Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM]