Marked up and edited acronym proposal

Hi Andrzej,

I have cleaned up the markup (and moved the Doctype to point to the OASIS spec). I also did technical and general editing.

As agreed in the SC meeting this past Tuesday, I also changed the name of the 'abbreviate-form' attribute to 'abbreviated-form' (added the 'd').

Here is the marked up proposal. I noticed that the example using OASIS used the wrong expanded form. The last 'S' stands for Standards, not Systems. Andrzej, please could you fix the Polish expanded word in the XML, since I can't do that ;-)

Please could you fix the error ASAP and send the proposal back to me.

While we probably could submit the proposal as-is after your fix, I think we need to expand the following sections:
Rendition (I want to clarify the tasks processors are expected to do in this section, since most of that information is currently scattered over the proposal)
Technical Requirements (I refer to the above info, but should probably specify the exact changes herein)
New or Changed Specification Language (I told them to read the rest of the proposal, but would like to expand this out...)

I will try to get to these 3 sections on Sunday so we can at least get this proposal to the DITA TC at the next meeting, for discussion the following week.

Thanks,
Gershon
 
Gershon L Joseph
Director of Technology and Single Sourcing
Tech-Tav Documentation Ltd. 
Secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Secretary, OASIS DITA Translation Subcommittee
Member, OASIS DocBook Technical Committee
 
+972-8-974-1569 (direct)
+972-57-314-1170 (mobile)
http://www.tech-tav.com