Re: [dita] otherprops syntax - should we specify?

Michael Priestley wrote:

Just wanted to start the
discussion
on the list. For background, take a look at the conditional processing
topic in the current draft of the spec.
  

  

  
It doesn't look like we have much movement, decision-wise, on this
topic. Maybe we would have a decision if we had something to decide on.
Would it help if someone like Michael post an otherprops spec proposal
and sample XML so some people can start to form some yea-or-nay
opinions?

Chris