Next in thread → Next in month →

Fw: [dita] <choice> without univ-atts

From
Eric Sirois <>
Date
2005-01-21T18:05:39+00:00
ID
Thread
Fw: [dita] <choice> without univ-atts
Hello,

I'm just posting a note that I sent to Chris recapping the issues that will
be fixed for DITA 1.0 to the list.

Eric
Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer
DB2 Universal Database - DBA XML Tools Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: 
Phone:(905) 413-2841
Blue Pages (Internal)

"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public
information and government
transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a
specific product or
platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document
formats.
----- Forwarded by Eric Sirois/Toronto/IBM on 01/21/2005 01:01 PM -----
                                                                           
             Eric                                                          
             Sirois/Toronto/IB                                             
             M                                                          To 
                                       Christopher Wong                    
             01/21/2005 09:00          <>                
             AM                                                         cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re: [dita] <choice> without         
                                       univ-atts(Document link: Eric       
                                       Sirois)                             
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           



Hi Chris,

This is a know issue. I have included a recap of issues that are in plan
for a fix for DITA 1.0.

Here are the links to the bug list that Don posted to the TC.

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200412/msg00028.html  (Issues 1
-8 )
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200501/msg00029.html  (details
for Issue 7)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200501/msg00004.html  (Issues 9 -
12)
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200501/msg00006.html (Issue 13 )

Here is the summary of the decisions in the meeting minutes of Jan 11:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200501/msg00041.html

No decision on issues 6, 7, and 10

Hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Eric
Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer
DB2 Universal Database - DBA XML Tools Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: 
Phone:(905) 413-2841
Blue Pages (Internal)

"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public
information and government
transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a
specific product or
platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document
formats.


                                                                           
             Christopher Wong                                              
             <[email protected]                                             
             om>                                                        To 
                                       DITA TC list                        
             01/20/2005 04:57          <>         
             PM                                                         cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
                                       [dita] <choice> without univ-atts   
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Why does the <choice> element, seemingly alone among others, not have
the usual collection of attributes most elements have (id, conref,
conditional processing)? It's a specialization of topic/li, which does
have these attributes. A similar element, <groupchoice> does have some
variation of %univ-atts;.

Chris
Next in thread → Next in month →