MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Michael Priestley <>
To: "Paul Prescod" <>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:14:21 -0500
I don't think the current examples are
necessarily wrong. The keyword element is not intended just for programming
keywords, especially when semantic specializations of keyword are available
such as <apiname>. Given that <keyword> has very little
semantics of its own, and given that specializations of it exist for many
specific cases, coming up with a generic example that isn't more suited
for a specialization is actually pretty hard. Generic search terms from
the text do seem reasonable to me, as an example of when to use <keyword>
specifically rather than one of its specializations.
Michael Priestley
Dept PRG IBM Canada phone: 416-915-8262
Toronto Information Development
"Paul Prescod"
<>
03/08/2005 08:02 AM
To
Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
<>
Subject
RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
Thank you. Your description clarifies things.
This is what I would have thought except were it not for the example in
the specification under "keywords".
The following example is metadata from an
installation task:
<prolog><keywords> <keyword>installing</keyword>
<keyword>uninstalling</keyword> <keyword>prerequisites</keyword>
<keyword>helps</keyword> <keyword>wizards</keyword>
</keywords> </prolog>
I would have understood if the example was:
<prolog><keywords> <keyword>class</keyword>
<keyword>if</keyword> <keyword>else</keyword> <keyword>elseif</keyword>
<keyword>assert</keyword> </keywords> </prolog>
Those are keywords in the sense that you define it in your
email.
From: Michael Priestley [mailto:]
Sent: Mon 3/7/2005 7:32 PM
To: Paul Prescod
Cc:
Subject: Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
Hi Paul, welcome to the list.
The reason we support keyword in both locations (as well as a bunch of
specializations of keywords) is to allow the same range of semantic specificity
in both places. For example, <apiname> is a type (specialization)
of keyword. If we have an occurrence of an <apiname> in content,
we may also want to index it specifically for search, if the occurrence
is significant. So we add it to the keyword list for the topic. But just
because it is a keyword for the topic doesn't mean it stops being an <apiname>.
In both contexts, being able to distinguish <apiname>blue</apiname>
from <wintitlel>blue</wintitle> is worthwhile. So we support
the same keyword element in both places.
In other words, <apiname> as content and <apiname> as keyword
for search are both still <apiname>s, so it doesn't make sense to
have a different set of elements just because they are processed differently:
their containment context (body or prolog) is enough, and allows
us to infer processing behavior without undermining the common semantics.
Michael Priestley
References:
RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: "Paul Prescod" <>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
