RE: [dita] Are indexterm ranges backwards incompatible?

From
Paul Prescod <>
Date
2006-08-15T19:12:39+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [dita] Are indexterm ranges backwards incompatible?
The fact that the distinction is "sometimes made" 
suggests to me that this is another thing to put in the hands of the end user to 
express however their tool expresses it. One can imagine options to the DITA 
toolkit (or other publishing engine):

 

generate-page-ranges-for-index-entries-on-adjacent-pages: 
Yes/no

generate-page-ranges-for-entire-topics: 
Yes/no

  

  
  From: Chris Wong [mailto:] 
  
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:04 AM
To: JoAnn Hackos; 
  Grosso, Paul; 
Subject: RE: [dita] Are 
  indexterm ranges backwards incompatible?

  

  
"A distinction is sometimes made between continued 
  discussion of a subject (index, for example, 34-36) and individual references 
  to the subject on a series of pages (34, 35, 36). " -- 17.9, Chicago Manual of 
  Style