OK if we defer to 1.2? I'm wary of touching
the DTDs/Schemas at this stage for 1.1.
Michael Priestley
IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
01/18/2007 09:36 PM
To
cc
Subject
[dita] figgroup: whither <data>?
This looks like an oversight...
The content model for figgroup is just enough to allow for the one specialization
of it that DITA ships with: syntax diagrams.
<!ELEMENT figgroup ((%title;)?,
(%figgroup; | %xref; | %fn; | %ph; |
%keyword;)* )
>
Conspicuously missing from that list are state, term, data and foreign
(perhaps also boolean, indexterm and foreign). Granted, these could
be wrapped in a ph, but the extra level of wrapping isn't always sensible
in the context of a specialization.
I'd like to see at least the four basic elements state, term, data and
foreign included into figgroup's content model, befitting its role as a
base for specializations.
--
Deborah Pickett
