RE: [dita] Need Clarification on Implications of Different List MarkupPatterns

From
Erik Hennum <>
Date
2008-02-13T02:24:01+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [dita] Need Clarification on Implications of Different List MarkupPatterns
Hi, Eric:

The constraints feature (approved for DITA 1.2) provides a separation of concerns for extension and authoring in document design:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/download.php/25090/IssueConstraints12008.html

Does this mechanism meet the requirements for the two tiers that you are envisaging?

Hoping that's interesting?

Erik Hennum



<> wrote on 02/12/2008 05:53:17 PM:

> What I would like the committee to consider is:

> 

> - Keeping the base topic and standard specializations loose enough to

> fit a variety of actual legacy data and internal standards, while still

> enforcing the basics of DITA

> 

> - Developing tighter "best practices" specializations of these that can

> serve as a role model for good markup, and that might also be used for

> new content vs. legacy content

> 

> What I think we DON'T want to do is to make the base spec so tight that

> it makes adopting DITA a matter of having to rewrite all your content

> immediately, or of being forced to accept a particular idea of "best

> practices" writing that may not match your own.

> 

> This "two-tier" approach could potentially give us the best of BOTH

> worlds.