Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain?
dita · February 2010 · 8 messages · back to month · +1 message in 1 other month
| # | Subject | From | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00033 | Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Kristen James Eberlein | 2010-02-09 14:47 |
| 00035 | RE: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Ogden, Jeff | 2010-02-09 15:04 |
| 00063 | RE: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Bruce Nevin (bnevin) | 2010-02-17 21:57 |
| 00064 | Re: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Mary McRae | 2010-02-17 22:05 |
| 00088 | RE: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Bruce Nevin (bnevin) | 2010-02-23 06:03 |
| 00089 | Re: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Mary McRae | 2010-02-23 07:13 |
| 00092 | RE: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Ogden, Jeff | 2010-02-23 13:10 |
| 00096 | RE: [dita] Acknowledgments in the DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they contain? | Grosso, Paul | 2010-02-23 21:53 |