On 6/3/10 2:43 PM, "Park Seth-R01164" <> wrote:
>
> We do say that that the DITA addressing model uses a fragment identifier
> syntax that is expressly *not* Xpointer.
>
> I would expect to see a non-normative reference to Xpointer to
> unambiguously identify the standard which DITA expressly does not
> implement.
Good point--I guess in that sense we *do* have at least a non-normative
relationship to XPointer.
Cheers,
E.
--
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com
