← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →
FW: [dita] Question: local content in
The <abbreviated-form> element has a fairly complex content model but it should probably be empty because there are good reasons never to render any content in it. Discussion below. Comment? /Bruce > From: Su-Laine Yeo [ mailto: ] > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:56 PM > To: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) > > Hi Bruce, > > Yes, that's a good summary of where my question lies. Given that > <abbreviated-form> can contain content, and actually has a pretty > complex content model, I think it would surprise users to have tools > ignore that content all the time. It's a bit strange that this isn't > simply defined as always being an empty element. However, the reasons > you gave for the expected behaviour that you describe are reasonable > too. > > Do you want to send your most recent message below to the TC? I think > this needs wider discussion. The most correct solution, unfortunately, > will probably be to leave the processing of content within > <abbreviated-form> undefined for now. > > Su-Laine > >
← Prev in month
← Prev in thread
Next in thread →
Next in month →