Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [dita] FW: New comment on "New discussion list open on a proposed XML Change Tracking Technical Committee"
Title: Email signature standard
Hi JoAnn,
Thank you for this post. It is worth
taking into account the ETSI LIS (ex LIA OSCAR) xml:tm
standard as a starting point:
http://www.gala-global.org/oscarStandards/xml-tm/xml-tm.html
There is no point in re-inventing the wheel or competing
standards.
Best Regards,
Andrzej Zydroń
---------------------------------------
CTO
XTM International Ltd.
PO Box 2167, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8XF, UK
email:
Tel: +44 (0) 1753 480 479
Mob: +44 (0) 7966 477 181
skype: Zydron
www.xtm-intl.com
On 28/06/2012 22:11, JoAnn Hackos wrote:
Dear
Friends,
Robin
LaFontaine and I have begun a discussion list in the OASIS
LinkedIn site about change tracking. Please consider joining
in the discussion that moves toward a possible Change
Tracking TC. See the link below. You’ll have to join the
LinkedIn group first.
JoAnn
JoAnn
T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech
Services Inc.
710
Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver,
CO 80215
skype
joannhackos
From:
[mailto:]
On Behalf Of OASIS
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:15 PM
To: JoAnn Hackos
Subject: New comment on "New discussion list open
on a proposed XML Change Tracking Technical Committee"
LinkedIn
Groups
Group:
OASIS
Discussion:
New
discussion list open on a proposed XML Change
Tracking Technical Committee
I
got it. This thread is the discussion. I thought
"discussion list" meant something more specific.
I am personally indifferent to this topic in
general. As a participant in the development of the
ODF specifications, there is no impact with respect
to an XML-level change-tracking proposal or activity
and I don't know what the compelling use case is for
a standardization effort at that level.
For ODF (I can't speak for DITA, and only observe
that DocBook might be an interesting case too), the
issue is at the semantic level of the document
format, not the fact that XML is used as a medium
for expressing the document structures for ODF.
Change tracking at ODF is based on the perceived
document, not its internal _expression_, and the
limited capabilities already in the ODF
specification, as much as they require work to
satisfy interoperability, are oriented in that
direction.
If it were thought that an XML-level
document-abstraction-neutral method were expected to
be achievable and incorporated in future standards
for higher-level document formats, I would be very
concerned. Put differently, the XML DOM is not the
ODF DOM. XML is a carrier for an elaborate
structural model that is not sensible when viewed as
XML alone.
Posted
by Dennis Hamilton
Like this
comment » Comment »
Stop
Following Discussion »
NEW
Now
you can comment by replying to this email.
You
are receiving Group Discussion emails.
Unsubscribe.
This
email was intended for JoAnn Hackos.
Learn why we
included this. © 2012,
LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct.
Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
Next in thread →
Next in month →