Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [dita] FW: New comment on "New discussion list open on a proposed XML Change Tracking Technical Committee"

From
Andrzej Zydron <>
Date
2012-07-03T07:15:14+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [dita] FW: New comment on "New discussion list open on a proposed XML Change Tracking Technical Committee"
Title: Email signature standard

  
  
    
Hi JoAnn,

        

      
      
      Thank you for this post. It is worth
          taking into account the ETSI LIS (ex LIA OSCAR) xml:tm
          standard as a starting point:

          

          http://www.gala-global.org/oscarStandards/xml-tm/xml-tm.html

          

          There is no point in re-inventing the wheel or competing
          standards.

          

          Best Regards,

          

        

      

        
        
        
        
        
        
Andrzej Zydroń

          

            

          
---------------------------------------

          
CTO

          
XTM International Ltd.

          
PO Box 2167, Gerrards Cross, SL9 8XF, UK

          
email:               

            

          
Tel: +44 (0) 1753 480 479

          
Mob: +44 (0) 7966 477 181

          
skype: Zydron

          
www.xtm-intl.com

          
 

          

            

          
 

          
 

          
 

        

      

      On 28/06/2012 22:11, JoAnn Hackos wrote:

    

    
      
      
      
      
      

        
Dear
            Friends,

        
Robin
            LaFontaine and I have begun a discussion list in the OASIS
            LinkedIn site about change tracking. Please consider joining
            in the discussion that moves toward a possible Change
            Tracking TC. See the link below. You’ll have to join the
            LinkedIn group first.

        
 

        
JoAnn

        
 

        

          
JoAnn
              T. Hackos, PhD

          
President

          
Comtech
              Services Inc.

          
710
              Kipling Street, Suite 400

          
Denver,
              CO 80215

          


          
skype
              joannhackos

          
 

          

          
 

        

        
 

        

          

            
From:
                
                [mailto:]
                On Behalf Of OASIS

                Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:15 PM

                To: JoAnn Hackos

                Subject: New comment on "New discussion list open
                on a proposed XML Change Tracking Technical Committee"

          

        

        
 

        
          
            

              
                LinkedIn
                  Groups
              
            

            

              
                
                  

                    Group:
                      OASIS

                  

                    Discussion:
                      New
                        discussion list open on a proposed XML Change
                        Tracking Technical Committee
                      

                
                
I
                    got it. This thread is the discussion. I thought
                    "discussion list" meant something more specific.

                    

                    I am personally indifferent to this topic in
                    general. As a participant in the development of the
                    ODF specifications, there is no impact with respect
                    to an XML-level change-tracking proposal or activity
                    and I don't know what the compelling use case is for
                    a standardization effort at that level.

                    

                    For ODF (I can't speak for DITA, and only observe
                    that DocBook might be an interesting case too), the
                    issue is at the semantic level of the document
                    format, not the fact that XML is used as a medium
                    for expressing the document structures for ODF.
                    Change tracking at ODF is based on the perceived
                    document, not its internal _expression_, and the
                    limited capabilities already in the ODF
                    specification, as much as they require work to
                    satisfy interoperability, are oriented in that
                    direction.
                    

                    

                    If it were thought that an XML-level
                    document-abstraction-neutral method were expected to
                    be achievable and incorporated in future standards
                    for higher-level document formats, I would be very
                    concerned. Put differently, the XML DOM is not the
                    ODF DOM. XML is a carrier for an elaborate
                    structural model that is not sensible when viewed as
                    XML alone.
                    

                  Posted
                    by Dennis Hamilton
                  

              
            

            

              
                
Like this
                          comment » Comment »
                    Stop
                          Following Discussion »
                    

              
            

            

              
                
                  
                    

                      
                        

                          
 

                        

                      
                    

                  
                
                
 

                
                  
                    

                      
                        
 NEW 

                      
                      
                        
                          
                            

                              
                                

                                  
 

                                

                              
                            

                          
                        
                      
                      
                        
Now
                            you can comment by replying to this email.

                      
                    

                  
                
              
            

            

              
                
                  
                    

                      
                        

                          
 

                        

                      
                    

                  
                
              
            

            

              
                
                  
                    

                      
                        
                          
                            

                              
                                

                                  
 

                                

                              
                            

                          
                        
                      
                    

                    

                      
                        
You
                            are receiving Group Discussion emails.
                            Unsubscribe.
                            

                        
                          
                            

                              
                                

                                  
 

                                

                              
                            

                          
                        
                        
This
                            email was intended for JoAnn Hackos.
                            Learn why we
                                included this. © 2012,
                            LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct.
                            Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
Next in thread → Next in month →