Requiring MathML for overline would be a lot of overhead when it seems like
an obvious parallel with underline and line-through.
That is, adding overline completes the under/middle/over trilogy.
Cheers,
E.
On 7/5/13 6:01 PM, "JoAnn Hackos" <> wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
> 13116 and 13117 look fine. Question: why wouldn't overline in 13031 be handled
> in MathML?
>
> JoAnn
>
> JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
> President
> Comtech Services Inc.
> 710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
> Denver, CO 80215
>
> 303-232-7586
>
>
--
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.rsicms.com
www.rsuitecms.com
Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press,
http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
