Re: Learning element again: lomStructure

Hi Robert, Thanks #3.
I've consulted two sources on the IEEE LOM values for structure, and both agree on a list of atomic, collection, networked, hierarchical, linear.
What's in the DTD appears correct.
I'm not sure what happened in the spec and schema, but I recommend we correct the spec and xsd to match the DTD list of (atomic collection networked hierarchical linear).
Thanks.
John ___________________________________ John Hunt Chair, OASIS DITA Learning and Training Content Sub-committee Senior Technical Content Architect IBM Collaboration Solutions User Experience: Design and Information Excellence
From: Robert D Anderson/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS
To: dita <>
Cc: John Hunt/Cambridge/IBM
Date: 02/17/2014 10:53 PM
Subject: Learning element again: lomStructure Updating attribute tables for lomStructure: http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/v1.2/os/spec/langref/lomStructure.html According to the specification, the legal values for @value are: (Collection Mixed Linear Hierarchical Networked Branched Parceled Atomic -dita-use-conref-target)

There are a few issues here.
Ignoring the "dita conref" value, the legal values in the DTD are atomic, collection, networked, hierarchical, and linear.
The legal values in the XSD differ; they are atomic, branshed (sic), collection, hierarchical, linear, mixed, networked, and parceled.
Once again, ignoring the case issues, the DTD is missing mixed, branched, and parceled.
The XSD has all the values, but has the wrong spelling for "branched".
I'm pretty sure we don't want to make "branshed" a legal value, but apart from that, I'm guessing that we we would like to make all 8 of these values (all lower case) legal in the DTD, XSD, and RelaxNG.
Does that sound right?
Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit ( http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/ )