Hi Chris,
I prefer "must", but I don't feel strongly about it.
Best Regards,
Bob Thomas
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Chris Nitchie <> wrote:
Yes, .htm should mean .html. I'm undecided about must vs. should on this one, but leaning must.
Best,
Chris
On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:24 PM, "Robert D Anderson" <> wrote:
Hi,
I see a draft comment in the write up for proposal 13107 (assume a default value for @format based on the extension of the linked resource. Bob's comment states:
This description needs to specify that a ".htm" extension MUST imply format value "html".
That's a slight change from the approved proposal, so I wanted to send to the TC before making that change.
1. Is that correct - an extension of "htm" means format="html" (rather than format="htm")?
2. Is this something that we want to list as MUST with a reference to the RFC terminology?
Thanks -
Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/)
--
Bob Thomas
+1 720 201 8260
Skype: bob.thomas.colorado
Instant messaging: Gmail chat () or Skype
Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7)
