I agree with this.
I would adjust the last sentence to "This is true even if the peer map
would have a higher key definition precedence."
If the referenced peer map already has a lower precedence then there's no
issue, I think it's clearer to highlight the specific case in question.
Cheers,
E.
—————
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com
On 12/9/14, 11:51 AM, "Chris Nitchie" <> wrote:
>1. If a map contains a reference to another DITA map with scope="peer" and
>keyscope set to some value, and that peer map cannot be loaded by the
>processor for whatever reason, the processor SHOULD issue a warning.
>
>2. A key reference for which no definition is available MUST always issue
>an error. If that key reference specifies a scope prefix matching the
>scope name on a peer mapref referring to unavailable content, processors
>MAY issue additional verbiage stating that the key might be defined in a
>currently-unavailable peer map.
>
>3. If a key reference specifies a scope prefix matching the scope name on
>a peer mapref referring to unavailable content, but the local map's key
>space also includes a definition for that key, the key resolves to the
>local map definition, and no message should be issued by the processor.
>That is, it is treated as a normal, resolvable key reference. This is true
>regardless of the relative precedence of the local definition and the peer
>mapref.
>
>Chris
>
>
>Chris Nitchie
>(734) 330-2978
>
>www.oberontech.com
> <http://www.oberontech.com/>
>Follow us:
> <https://www.facebook.com/oberontech>
> <https://twitter.com/oberontech>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/oberon-technologies>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
