Re: [dita] Re: Questions about csprd01
Chet, adding a line break involves style sheet work that we had not
planned for.
Is it really necessary?
Are there other work stages where we will need a similar two
line title?
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 6/25/2015 2:06 PM, Chet Ensign
wrote:
Yes to all save noting that there is a soft return
after the "/" so that Public Review Draft 01 is on a second
line.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM,
Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
OK, so you need two
packages: csd01 and csprd01
Identical content, different titles and metadata and links
The TC needs to approve both.
The title on the cover page for csprd01 shoult literally
be "Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft
01 ".
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein
(skype)
On 6/25/2015 10:52 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Hi Kris,
The stage should be done as:
Committee Specification Draft 01 /
Public Review Draft 01
The Previous version link should be left as N/A.
For Previous version links, we use the most recent
version with differences - e.g. CSPRD01 when this is
CSPRD02. But since the content of CSD01 and CSPRD01
are identical, they both use N/A for Previous
version.
/chet
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:27
AM, Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
For the
title on the cover pages and the citation
format, which of the following should it be?
Committee Specification Public Review
Draft 01
Public Review Draft 01
On the cover pages, what should be listed in
the "Previous version" section?
Not applicable
Links for csd01, for example, http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csd01/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.html
As always, thanks for your help and speedy
feedback.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919
682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 6/24/2015 11:45 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Just a few things - very
close...
A number of the links (e.g. This
version) are italicized. Make them
plain.
Latest version links are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-csd01-part0-overview.xxx.
The csd01 needs to be removed so that
the links are http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part0-overview.xxx.
That also has to change in the citation
block.
The TC link needs to be to https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dita/
The '2005' should be removed from the
copyright statement in the footnote
In PDF, the footer should appear on
the first page
In Part 1, the footer still has WD-
at the start of the filename
On Wed, Jun 24,
2015 at 10:43 AM, Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
Please
ignore my earlier e-mail, and look at
the PDF files in the attached ZIP.
Have I incorporated your feedback
correctly?
Many thanks.
--
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical
Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein
Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919
682-2290; kriseberlein
(skype)
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards
Development and TC
Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards
for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1
973-996-2298
Mobile: +1
201-341-1393
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC
Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the
information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1
973-996-2298
Mobile: +1
201-341-1393
--
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information
society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393