← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Fwd: [dita-comment] Interaction of "processing" and "translation" attribute

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2017-06-17T13:22:21+00:00
ID
Thread
Fwd: [dita-comment] Interaction of "processing" and "translation" attribute
For discussion on Tuesday, 20 June.

    

    
I think the tools vendor is making an incorrect assumption that
      resource-only items (for example, items referenced by
      <keydef> elements) should not be translated.

    
Others? And will our decision here trigger a need for an item in
      errata 02?

    

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    

      

      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      
        
          

            Subject:
            
            [dita-comment] Interaction of "processing" and
              "translation" attribute
          

          

            Date: 
            Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
          

          

            From: 
            Stefan Eike <>
          

          

            To: 
            
          

        
      
      

      

      
      
Dear DITA TC,

        

        I'm unsure about the interaction of the "processing" and the
        "translation" attributes. I had a discussion with one of our
        DITA tool vendors, and we interprete the specification
        differently.

        

        Consider a <keydef>:

        

        <keydef keys="foo" href=""/>

        

        We have many <keydef> elements like this in our docs. We
        use <keydef> elements to point to "database topics". These
        topics should not be rendered in the output, but these database
        topics contain reusable textual elements (like <ph> or
        <dlentry>), that are conkeyrefed into rendered topics. A
        <keydef> element implicitely sets
        processing-role="resource-only". So for us, topics referenced
        with <keydef> should be translated, because they might
        contain text.

        

        Our DITA tool vendor says, a <keydef> is resource-only and
        resource-only "things" should not be translated. I assumed, that
        the "resource-only" would not affect translations. I could not
        find a statement in the specs that determines that. I expected,
        that, by default, a <keydef> should be processed like any
        other element, so it should be "translated", unless
        translate="no" is set.

        

        

        So I expected, that, if I'd like to avoid the translation of a
        <keydef> referenced topic, I would explicitely need to
        write:

        

        <keydef keys="foo" href="" translate="no"/>

      

      

      

      
Could you please clarify?

      

      

      

      
Thank you and best regards,

      

      
Stefan Eike

      

      -- This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to
      the
      OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC.
      In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
      to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
      before posting.
      Subscribe: 
      Unsubscribe: 
      List help: 
      List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-comment/
      Feedback License:
      http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
      List Guidelines:
      http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
      Committee:
      http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita
      Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread