Error now fixed in Spec

Thanks for clarifying this, Tom. I've fixed it. Glad that you
      caught this!

    
Bob, can I ask you to rebuild? My apologies for the churn.

    

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    
On 1/17/2018 6:02 PM, Tom Magliery
      wrote:

    

    
      
      
      
      
      

        
There's
            an error in these documents that has slipped through. I
            don't think we can just ignore it, because we SAID in Errata
            02 that we fixed it, but in actuality we did not. I flagged
            this in the DITAweb review, but I think Kris misinterpreted
            my comment and rejected it.

        
 

        
The
            topic is "2.2.3.4 Processing controlled attribute values"

        

            [source file is
\specification\archSpec\base\processing-controlled-attribute-values.dita]

        

            

        
Output
            text as it appeared in Spec+Errata01 (also seen in the
            "Original text" column of the big change-table of Errata02):

        
               
            If "therapist" is flagged and "novice-therapist" is not
            explicitly flagged, processors automatically should flag
            "novice" since it is a type of therapist.

        
 

        
Output
            text as it is supposed to be corrected in Spec+Errata02
            (also seen in the "Revised text" column of the big
            change-table):

        
               
            If "therapist" is flagged and "novice-therapist" is not
            explicitly flagged, processors automatically should flag
            "novice-therapist" since it is a type of therapist.

        
 

        
Markup
            currently in Errata02 branch of source in github (this is
            consistent with the output as rendered in the XHTML and PDF
            output produced by Bob today):

        
 

        
<li>If "therapist" is flagged
            and "novice<ph rev="errata-02">-therapist</ph>"
            is not

        
explicitly flagged, processors
            automatically should flag "novice" since it is a type of

        
therapist.</li>

        
                               
                                              

        
The
            correct markup should be:

        
 

        
<li>If "therapist" is flagged
            and "novice-therapist" is not explicitly flagged, 

        
processors automatically should
            flag "novice<ph rev="errata-02">-therapist</ph>"
            

        
since it is a type of
            therapist.</li>

        
 

        
mag

        
 

        
 

        
 

        

          
From: 
              [mailto:] On Behalf Of Robert
              Thomas

              Sent: January 17, 2018 9:45 AM

              To: 

              Subject: [dita] Groups - All XHTML for public
              review 23 January 2018 uploaded

        

        
 

        
Submitter's message

          All XHTML .zips for the 23 January 2018 public review of
          Errata02 

          -- Mr. Robert Thomas 

        
          
            

              
                
Document
                      Name:
                    All XHTML for public review
                      23 January 2018

                

                    

                
No
                    description provided. 

                    Download Latest Revision

                    Public Download Link

                

                    

                
Submitter:
                    Mr. Robert Thomas

                    Group:
                    OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA)
                    TC

                    Folder:
                    Drafts

                    Date
                        submitted: 2018-01-17 09:43:56