Re: Re-branded committee note HTML

From
Kristen James Eberlein <>
Date
2019-02-05T20:49:21+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: Re-branded committee note HTML
Paul -- Just to check, when you write "left-justified," is what
      you want us to do is remove the indentation and so make the text
      start at the left border?

    

    
Best,

      Kris

      

      Kristen James Eberlein

      Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

      Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

      www.eberleinconsulting.com

      +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)

      

    

    
On 2/5/2019 12:11 PM, Paul Knight
      wrote:

    

    
      
      

        
Hi Kris and all,
          

          

          
This looks pretty good.

          

          

          
I noted a few items which should be addressed if
            possible:

          

          

          
- The headings of the Appendices should include the word
            "Appendix" (i.e., "Appendix AÂ Acknowledgments" instead of
            current "AÂ Acknowledgments")

          

          

          
- The HTML <title> tag is set to "Specification
            URIs" instead of the actual title "DITA 1.3: Why Three
            Editions? Version 1.0". (this affects the browser tab, etc.)

          

          

          
- Remove front matter indenting - In the Notes template
            (different from Standards Track template), the text below
            the front matter headings should be left-justified if
            possible. (Similar to the PDF.)

          
-- URIs for "This version" and "Latest version" should be
            left-justified, similar to "Previous version:" with the text
            "Not applicable" (which should actually be "N/A')

          
-- Editors list should be left-justified, similar to
            Chair.

          
-- Bulleted items under "Additional artifacts" and
            "Related work" should have the bullets at the left margin if
            possible.

          
-- The text under "Citation format" should also be
            left-justified.

          

          

          
- Front page title font sizes: The headings for "This
            version", "Previous version", and "Latest version" are the
            right size, but all the following headings (Technical
            Committee, Chairs, Editors, etc.) should be the same font
            size as "Specification URIs". (They are all Arial 14 in
            current template.)

          

          

          
- In the body text, the font size for the level two
            headers (like 1.1) is somewhat small - I found that setting
            "h2.topictitle2" to fontsize:140% (instead of 120%) in
            "oasis-note.css" seems about right.

          

          

          
Best regards,

          
Paul

        

      

      

      

        
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:26 AM
          Kristen James Eberlein <>
          wrote:

        

        Zip
          attached; please confirm that this is what OASIS wants.

          

          Thanks!

          

          -- 

          Best,

          Kris

          

          Kristen James Eberlein

          Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee

          Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting

          www.eberleinconsulting.com

          +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)

          

        
      

      
      

      

      -- 

      

        

          

            

              

                

                  

                    

                      

                        

                          

                            
Paul
                                  Knight....Document
                                Process Analyst...mobile: +1
                                781-883-1783

                            
OASIS
                                - Advancing open standards for the
                                information society