Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [dita] Re: Rebranded committee note PDF for you to look at
Hi, Paul.
Many thanks for checking this over; I appreciate it.
Re the unnumbered subheadings -- These represent sections, which
are subelements of the DITA topics. We only number topics. We've
had this discussion with OASIS Administration and the TAB before
-- would you like me to uncover these discussions and forward them
to you?
The practice of NOT numbering subelements in DITA TC documents is
most clearly seen in our spec language reference topics. For
example, see
http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata01/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/base/navtitle.html#navtitle
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
On 2/4/2019 11:30 AM, Paul Knight
wrote:
Hi Kris,
I noted one small template change which should be applied,
and also want to add a note on the URIs.
- The PDF page footer should also appear on the first page
(It was omitted earlier due to conflict with the long purple
sidebar.)
- While not actually a template issue, I want to note that
we will use "https" instead of "http" in the URIs for all
future OASIS publications.Â
(Note this is not retroactive, so the URIs of earlier
(pre-https) publications - as in "Previous version" or items
in References - should still be cited with "http". This is
important particularly for HTML documents which use .css
scripts - i.e., most DITA publications. The .css scripts are
not activated if older "http" HTML documents are retrieved
using "https".)
I have not analyzed the fonts, but this all looks good.
I'll mention one other item, with no specific
conclusion... In Section 2.4, "Future of DITA", (and other
similar places) there are two unnumbered subheadings
("Lightweight DITA" and "DITA 2.0") which are not a part of
the OASIS style templates.Â
These have been handled in a reasonable way here. In
general, we'd prefer to avoid these non-standard elements and
simply use the next level of section heading (i.e, 2.4.1 and
2.4.2).Â
While you have handled it fairly well here, it is a source
of unnecessary complication in some cases.
Best regards,
Paul
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:42 PM
Kristen James Eberlein <>
wrote:
See
attached PDF. Let me know if you see any issues. Obviously, we
are
still using Arial and Calibri as fonts.
I used the DITA source for the "Why three editions of DITA
1.3"
committee note, so it can be compared to the 2015 PDF.
--
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype)
--
Paul
Knight....Document
Process Analyst...mobile: +1
781-883-1783
OASIS
- Advancing open standards for the
information society
Next in thread →
Next in month →